Pronger’s Contract Under Scrutiny

03 Aug

Currently, it appears that the NHL has been reviewing Pronger and Hossa’s contract for a possible breach of the CBA and salary cap.  The long and short of it is: if Pronger retires his salary stays on the books but, because of the extended years of the contract, is less of a cap hit to deal with.

The NHL is trying to figure out whether or not the Flyers, and Blackhawks, discussed the possibility of retirement with either of these players before the contract was finalized.

NHLPA executive director Paul Kelly is quoted as saying:

“This is an obvious effort by the League to attempt to chill the market for long term contracts. It is worth noting that the contracts have been registered by the NHL, which means that they are fully compliant with the CBA – so, as the registration proves, long term deals with structures such a Hossa and Pronger are perfectly proper and permissible. The NHLPA will take whatever steps are necessary to insure that Players continue to have the unfettered ability to negotiate contracts that are compliant with existing CBA rules.”


SOURCE(S): not used for this posting, but gives a better insight on the whole issue


Posted by on August 3, 2009 in Flyers Talk and Other


Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 responses to “Pronger’s Contract Under Scrutiny

  1. broadstreetbully

    August 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM

    Here’s Bettmann and the NHL trying to screw the Flyers. They have to let contracts go through and agree to them through the NHLPA, right? So why are they second guessing Hossa and Pronger’s contract?

  2. jeffdeangelis

    August 3, 2009 at 10:20 PM

    It can be a legitimate issue though. If teams are signing players over 35 to these long term deals, and front loading their contracts so they get the most money in the first 3-4 years, then tapering off after wards, then teams are technically cheating the salary cap if that player was to retire.

    Of course, the NHL would probably nix a contract that was blatantly in violation, and Hossa and Prongers did pass, so they can’t have been that deceptive.

  3. broadstreetbully

    August 4, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    Yeah Pronger is 34 so we’re good.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: